Talk:Dôme du Goûter

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains: Alps Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Alps task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Italy?

Hi, Ericoides, here:[[1]], here: [[2]], and here [[3]], they don't think like you! Why your version should be the best? --79.5.70.66 (talk) 13:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Institut Géographique National map here [4] shows that it lies wholly within France. Can you give me a reference to a map at the same scale that shows that it is on the border? Ericoides (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can just watch at italians maps, IGM or Aosta Valley maps:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=D%C3%B4me+du+Go%C3%BBter&sll=46.528635,12.546387&sspn=10.916239,20.478516&ie=UTF8&ll=45.847695,6.893234&spn=0.086332,0.159988&t=p&z=13 The 'Dôme' itself lies in France. Jorrit-H (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links 87.11.221.103. They are interesting, but in my opinion they are 1. too old, 2. very sketchy and hard to interpret, and 3. lack the clarity and up-to-dateness of the IGN map (which isn't a computer-generated map like your examples, but is a photograph of an authoritative and actual map. Could you please give a link to a jpeg of a photograph of a map that is as up to date and authoritative as the IGN. Cheers! Ericoides (talk) 08:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IGM is authoritative as IGN, on italians maps the 'Dôme' is both italian and french.--Shardan (talk) 09:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to seeing a jpeg, but I've made a note regarding the anomaly on the article page. Ericoides (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buon giorno, Where is your famous map from IGM showing that the Dôme du Goûter is on the border ? All the maps I've seen, even the one putting the Mont Blanc / Monte Bianco on the border, show that the Dôme du Goûter is in France and only in France. The dispute only concerns the area between Mont Blanc and Mont Blanc de Courmayeur.

Have you got some reference, except your word ? Best regards. Ciao. Gemini1980 (msg) 01:18, 29 apr 2008 (CEST)

Hello. I agree with Gemini. Can you please produce a modern map with the same authority as the IGN map before you revert again. Cheers! 87.113.7.49 (msg) 10:21, 29 apr 2008 (CEST)

IGM (Istituto Geografico Militare)[5] is the italian counterpart of French IGN, and maps from National Cartographic Web Portal [6] (Portale Cartografico Nazionale) are modern and updated, despite their graphic. The border’s red line is computer generated by Italian National Ministry of Environment [7][[8]] (in 2006, border’s red line was not active). Here [9] you can even buy maps (jpeg are not allowed because of copyright), and in every IGM map about the Dome, the summit is both Italian and French. The dispute about borders, doesn’t concerns only Mont Blanc or the Dome, but even Col du Géant [[10]]. By --Shardan (talk) 14:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dôme du Goûter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090905051144/http://www.pcn.minambiente.it/viewer/viewer.htm?service=IGM25000&box=6.79835325521947%3A45.7000086980552%3A7.10467424833438%3A45.9625695492965 to http://www.pcn.minambiente.it/viewer/viewer.htm?service=IGM25000&box=6.79835325521947%3A45.7000086980552%3A7.10467424833438%3A45.9625695492965

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]